Legal Opinion

Plummer v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1886No. 11335PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

The only question for consideration on this appeal is, whether the court below erred in' sustaining a demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that it did not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

It appears from the allegations contained in the complaint that there was a contest between the plaintiff and John A. Brown before the register and receiver of the United States land-office, about the right to purchase from the United States, under the pre-emption and homestead laws, a tract of public land in Los Angeles County, described as the southeast quarter of section 23 in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Buckley v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Estes v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Jameson v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. King v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Cull v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API