Legal Opinion

Van Winkle v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1983No. 82-690PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The plaintiff, Ruth Van Winkle, was injured on May 20, 1981, while employed as an electricator at Electric Hose & Rubber Co. She felt something “pop” in her lower back while pushing a tub full of rubber hose during the course of her employment. In this proceeding plaintiff sought permanent and total disability benefits on the basis that the back injury which she suffered resulted in a hysteric conversion reaction which has left her paralyzed from the waist down.

After the initial hearing before a single judge, the cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. Kay Windsor, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Erving v. Tri-Con Industries & Cornhusker Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McCann v. HOLY SEPULCHRE CEMETERY ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Davis v. Western ElectricNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lee v. Lincoln Cleaning & Dye WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Doty v. Aetna Life & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Starr v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API