Legal Opinion

Erving v. Tri-Con Industries & Cornhusker Casualty Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1982No. 44201PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

The appellant, Katherine Erving, appeals from a judgment of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court, entered by the court on rehearing, which found that while Mrs. Erving suffered a compensatory injury for which she was entitled to temporary compensation, she failed to establish that as a result of the accident she suffered any disability beyond September 21, 1980. Accordingly, the Workmen’s Compensation Court denied any recovery to Mrs. Erving beyond September 21, 1980. It is from this order that Mrs. Erving appeals. Her employer, Tri-Con Industries, has cross-appealed, maintaining that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Welke v. City of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cardenas v. Peterson Bean Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Crosby v. American Stores & Kemper Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Smith v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sandel v. Packaging Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Schlup v. Auburn Needleworks, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mulder v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Smith v. ErftmierNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API