Legal Opinion

Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1991No. 90-1202PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

The defendant-appellant employer, Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc., and its insurer, defendant-appellant General Casualty Company, contend that the evidence does not support the 50-percent loss of earning power benefit the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court awarded the plaintiff-appellee employee, Arthur Kraft. We affirm.

It is unquestioned that on July 14,1987, the then 63-year-old Kraft was involved in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as a carpenter with Paul Reed Construction when he was kicked and punched by a fellow employee and caused to fall over a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cardenas v. Peterson Bean Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Yager v. Bellco MidwestNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Scamperino v. Federal Envelope Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Jeffers v. Pappas Trucking, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mortimer v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Zavala v. ConAgra Beef Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hynes v. Good Samaritan Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Bernhardt v. County of Scotts BluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API