Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
The defendant-appellant employer, Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc., and its insurer, defendant-appellant General Casualty Company, contend that the evidence does not support the 50-percent loss of earning power benefit the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court awarded the plaintiff-appellee employee, Arthur Kraft. We affirm.
It is unquestioned that on July 14,1987, the then 63-year-old Kraft was involved in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as a carpenter with Paul Reed Construction when he was kicked and punched by a fellow employee and caused to fall over a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Cardenas v. Peterson Bean Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Yager v. Bellco MidwestNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Scamperino v. Federal Envelope Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Jeffers v. Pappas Trucking, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mortimer v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Zavala v. ConAgra Beef Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Hynes v. Good Samaritan Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Bernhardt v. County of Scotts BluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.