Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Kay Windsor, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 41130PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which plaintiff seeks to recover benefits for a heart attack. The single-judge Workmen’s Compensation Court at the initial hearing, and the three-judge Workmen’s Compensation Court on rehearing, held that plaintiff had failed to prove that the heart attack and its resulting. disabilities arose out of and in the course of his employment by the defendant, and dismissed the petition. Plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff, Maurice Hyatt, was 65 years of age and had been employed by various clothing firms as a traveling salesman of women’s wear for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brokaw v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Reis v. Douglas County HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Moser v. JeffreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Salinas v. Cyprus Industrial Minerals Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sandel v. Packaging Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smith v. Fremont Contract Carriers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stephens v. Celeryvale Transport, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sellens v. Allen Products Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API