Legal Opinion

State v. Salinas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1994No. CR-94-0131-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

The state petitioned this court to review a court of appeals decision setting aside defendant’s conviction and sentence because his guilty plea to possession of marijuana for sale lacked a sufficient factual basis. We granted review to determine whether the trial court correctly found that a sufficient factual basis existed for defendant’s guilty plea. We have jurisdiction to hear this apPeal pursuant to Anz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and rule 31.19, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May 1992, defendant Jeffrey Salinas was charged in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. WallaceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. ArceArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Edward James RoseArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. ChairezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State of Arizona v. Kevin Ottar and Ruan Junior HamiltonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Luis Yepez-Vargas v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API