Legal Opinion
Proulx v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1981No. 80-471PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
On April 30, 1980, the District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board (hereinafter the Retirement Board) concluded that Officer Jack T. Proulx is not permanently disabled for the performance of duty as a policeman and, therefore is not eligible for disability retirement under D.C. Code 1980 Supp., § 4-527(1). In so concluding, the Retirement Board rejected the June 7, 1979 recommendation of the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons that Proulx is “permanently disabled for duty.” * Petitioner argues that neither the Retirement Board’s finding of no permanent disability nor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jameson's Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Liberty v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mathis v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Greater Washington Business Center v. D.C. Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Vieira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dowd v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.