Legal Opinion
Liberty v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 4, 1979No. 13648PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This case presents the question whether there is substantial evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the Police and. Firemen’s Retirement Board that a disabled patrolman’s coronary artery disease had not been incurred in or aggravated by the performance of duty. See D.C.Code 1973, §§ 4-527 (1) and (2). Because the récord does not support the Board’s findings that family history was “the most significant factor” and that “police duties played no part” in the patrolman’s disabling condition — and because we cannot say that the Board did not rely on these…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Jameson's Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Johnson v. Board of Appeals and ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses' Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wisconsin Avenue Nursing Home v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Greater Washington Business Center v. D.C. Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.