Legal Opinion
Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 12, 2006No. SC 17453PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
This is the second appeal in these consolidated product liability actions. The first appeal followed a judgment rendered for the defendants, Quality Steel Products, Inc. (Quality Steel), and Qual-Craft Industries, Inc., after a jury verdict in the defendants’ favor. In that appeal, we reversed the judgment in part and ordered a new trial. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc., 263 Conn. 424, 427, 820 A.2d 258 (2003).
The defendants jointly appeal 2 from the judgment rendered, following a jury trial, in favor of the named plaintiffs, Neil Barry and Bernard Cohade. 3 The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Security Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Renaissance Management Co. v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Mahon v. B v. Unitron Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.