Legal Opinion

Village of Hibbing v. Township of Stuntz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1947No. 34,431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action by the village of Hibbing against the township of Stuntz to recover charges for maintenance of a water conduit known as the Kelly Lake water line serving defendant and certain of its residents. The issue for determination is whether, under the terms of a written contract between the parties executed August 2, 1945, plaintiff is entitled to recover for such maintenance for all of the year 1945 or merely for the period between August 2, 1945, the date of the contract, and December 31, 1945.

The trial court held that under the contract plaintiff was entitled to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maize v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Bell Lumber Co. v. SeamanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Lawton v. JoestingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Northern Welding Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Standard Clothing Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anchor Casualty Co. v. Bird Island Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Bergland Oil Co. Inc. v. GrommeshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Delyea v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Delyea v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API