Bell Lumber Co. v. Seaman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in replevin in the district court for Itasca county or, if possession of the property could not be had, to recover $800, its value, and $300 for its detention.
Read the full summary
Action in replevin in the district court for Itasca county or, if possession of the property could not be had, to recover $800, its value, and $300 for its detention. The ease was tried before Stanton, J., who when plaintiff rested and at the close of the testimony denied defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $806.24, less four items in dispute amounting to $181.32. Prom an order denying their joint and several motions for judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial as to each and all of them,…
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
This action was brought to recover the possession of certain timber products, poles and posts, alleged to be wrongfully detained by defendants. Plaintiff had a verdict and defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for judgment or a new trial. Defendant Prank P. Seaman is the principal defendant in interest, and in the statement *107of the ease will be referred to as defendant. The facts of the case are substantially as follows:
Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in dealing in timber products, such as ties, poles, posts and pulpwood, with its office and place of business at…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Pillsbury Co., Inc. v. Wells Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Floyd v. Ring Const. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Pike Rapids Power Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Kermit H. Severson, D/B/A Cardel Company v. Marcus FleckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.