Rodgers v. Sun Oil Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
In mid-afternoon of March 26, 1956 plaintiff drove his automobile to the defendant’s service station at Allegheny and Hunting Park Avenue in. Philadelphia. The attendant in charge, one Beneker, at plaintiff’s request, tightened the emergency brake and adjusted it for normal functioning; he also refueled the car and lubricated the differential. This done, plaintiff asked Beneker to run Bardahl through the engine. Bardahl is the trade name of a chemical compound, with a light oil base, which is used to free sticky valves and to burn out carbon in an automobile engine. Sun Oil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mozino v. CanusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Cherry v. MitoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Savitz v. GALLACCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Murphy v. Wolverine Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Kiska v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Townsend v. United States Rubber CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Commonwealth v. D'AlonzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- McCann v. Amy Joy Donut ShopsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- McCann v. Amy Joy Donut ShopsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.