Legal Opinion

Mozino v. Canuso

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1956No. Appeal, 281PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff sued in assumpsit to recover damages for the defendant partnership’s alleged breach of an oral contract whereby the partnership was permitted to dig and remove fill from land of the plaintiff at so much per cubic yard with the further understanding and agreement that any rock encountered in the operation would be removed by the defendants and that the digging would be done in such a manner that, when completed, the surface of the ground would be left in a smooth and even grade. The partnership consisted of Francis A. Canuso and Francis A. Canuso, Jr.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Foster v. WaybrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Karns v. TannerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Clewell v. PummerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. MacIna v. McAdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Lupi v. KeenanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Hartigan v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API