Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCann v. Amy Joy Donut Shops

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1984No. 748Published

1DissentCavanaugh, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Following a verdict for the defendant, appellants sought a new trial asserting in their briefs and arguments three allegations of error. The motion for a new trial was denied and the present appeal based on the same issues was pursued. I would find that the trial court erred in charging the jury that contributory negligence is a defense to strict liability. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter, 462 Pa. 83, 337 A.2d 893 (1975) and that error was also committed when the court gave the uncalled witness charge in inappropriate circumstances. Bentivoglio v. Ralston, 447 Pa. 24,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API