Legal Opinion

Kiska v. Rosen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeal, 244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The plaintiff sued in assumpsit to recover the amount of $966.66 with interest, representing the balance due on a promissory note in the principal sum of $2,000.00 on which part payments had been made totalling $1,033.34. The note reads as follows:

“$2000 00/100 Feb. 4, 1950

One (1) year after date we promise to pay to the order of Anthony M. Ehska

Two Thousand ................00/100 Dollars

Payable at 936 N. Newmarket St., Phila. Without defalcation, for value received @ 6% per annum.

Jos. Rosen & Sons

Joseph Rosen-Milton Rosen

No. 59 Due Feb. 4, 1951 Atty.”

The complaint in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mozino v. CanusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Savitz v. GALLACCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Horwath v. SimonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Brunetto v. FerraraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Nenna & Frain, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In re Estate of DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics Corporation, Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Rodgers v. Sun Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. McKee v. MoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API