Legal Opinion
Kyle v. Wiley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1951No. 1006Published
1Opinion of the Court
78 A.2d 769 (1951)
KYLE
v.
WILEY.
No. 1006.
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Reargued January 8, 1951.
Decided February 16, 1951.
George C. Dreos, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Catherine McCloskey, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and CLAGETT, Judges.
HOOD, Judge.
This appeal is from an order dismissing an amended complaint and our first question is whether the appeal was timely taken. The question arises from the following circumstances. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint, having been previously denied, was reheard and taken under…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Boykin v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Conrad v. MedinaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.