Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Carey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Branch. (Pealer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Chandler sued the Careys in justice’s court. He ■declared orally in assumpsit upon the following instrument as a promissory note:

“$119.00.
“ For value received, we jointly or severally promise to pay Alonzo Heath, or bearer, one hundred nineteen dollars, on or before the first day of October next, upon completion of the work to be done by said Heath on a dwelling-house to be built by him for said first parties.
“February 7, 188J/.. Abbey J. Carey.
“D. W. Carey.”

The defendants pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of set-off and recoupment.

Upon the trial in that court the plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. HargreavesMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. CarleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wagner v. KincaidMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Schlesinger v. ArlineU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API