Legal Opinion
Schlesinger v. Arline
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Decided June 27, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Action on Promissory Notes.
1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.
The plaintiff brings his action on a promissory note written in the following language;
“Four months after date we promise to pay to the order of M. Nussbaum & Co., $539.46, for value received, payable at the Exchange Bank, Macon, G-a., with interest from March-, at the rate of eight per cent, per annum,' with all costs of collection, including ten per cent, attorney’s fees. [Signed] “T. C. Arline & Co.”
The plaintiff, who sues as indorsee, having taken the note by assignment from Nussbaum who was the payee, is a non-resident of this state, but Nussbaum resides here. The defendants demur to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank of New Windsor v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Jones v. RadatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Maryland Fertilizing & Manufacturing Co. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Johnston Harvester Co. v. ClareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Thompson v. SloanNew York Supreme Court · 1840
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995