Legal Opinion

Schlesinger v. Arline

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action on Promissory Notes.

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

The plaintiff brings his action on a promissory note written in the following language;

“Four months after date we promise to pay to the order of M. Nussbaum & Co., $539.46, for value received, payable at the Exchange Bank, Macon, G-a., with interest from March-, at the rate of eight per cent, per annum,' with all costs of collection, including ten per cent, attorney’s fees. [Signed] “T. C. Arline & Co.”

The plaintiff, who sues as indorsee, having taken the note by assignment from Nussbaum who was the payee, is a non-resident of this state, but Nussbaum resides here. The defendants demur to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Bank of New Windsor v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Jones v. RadatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  3. Maryland Fertilizing & Manufacturing Co. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Johnston Harvester Co. v. ClareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Thompson v. SloanNew York Supreme Court · 1840

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API