McCully v. Radack
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1974.]
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
History is uncertain whether William Arthur Dunkerly 1 ever uttered the signal remark that, “This is just like that only it’s different,” but if he did he may well have been referring to that hybrid of the law, the limited partnership. It is neither a partnership, as that term is usually defined, nor is it a corporation, although it bears a strong resemblance to both. It has been said that a limited partnership is in the nature of an investment, In re Panitz & Co., 270 F. Supp. 448 (D. Md. 1967) aff'd sub nom. Hammerman v. Arlington Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 385 F. 2d 834 (4th Cir. 1967). A…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ford Motor Co. v. BeauchampSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Scalisi v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd. v. Silldorf, BurdmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Allright Missouri, Inc. v. BilleterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Moore v. 1600 Downing Street, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.