Legal Opinion
Moore v. 1600 Downing Street, Ltd.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1983No. 80CA0529PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERMAN, Judge.
In a derivative action by a limited partner, plaintiff, Robert Moore, appeals the summary judgment entered for defendants. Because we find that there are genuine issues of material fact to be determined, we reverse and remand to the trial court.
This limited partnership derivative action was filed by Moore, a limited partner having a 6% interest, on behalf of himself and on behalf of the limited partnership, 1600 Downing Street, Ltd. Moore later conceded both in his appellate briefs and at oral argument that he was not pursuing any claims on his own behalf; rather, it was purely…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Davis v. Comed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- G. A. Enterprises, Inc. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Governor's Ranch Professional Center, Ltd. v. Mercy of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cohen v. Empire Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gavend v. MalmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Miller v. Solaglas California, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Caley Investments I v. Lowe Family Associates, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.