Legal Opinion

Hynes v. Jennings

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ or Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Defendant in error, Julia Hynes, filed her bill in the circuit court of Cook county for partition and for an accounting. The land sought to be partitioned is lot 23, block 44, in S. E. Gross’ Fourth addition to Dauphin Park, being a subdivision of a tract of land particularly described in the bill; lot 42, block 6, in Archer’s addition to Chicago, (a subdivision of a tract of land described,) referred to in the briefs as the Twenty-fourth street property, the property being improved by a two-story brick fiat-building and rented to tenants; lots 35 and 36, block 10, in Johnson & Clements’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. RenoIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. McMullen v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Stollard v. NycumIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Glos v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fyffe v. FyffeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. Finle v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Baughman v. BaughmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  5. Peterson v. KampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API