Legal Opinion

Glos v. Clark

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

In Clark v. Glos, 180 Ill. 556, it was determined that certain city lots in the city of Evanston, Cook- county, Illinois, were owned by the parties hereto in the following proportions, to-wit: Emma J. Glos an undivided five-eighths and Alexander Clark an undivided three-eighths. This was a bill in chancery brought by the appellant against the appellee, in the superior court of Cook county, to partition said lots. The appellee, Clark, filed an answer admitting the allegations of the bill as to the title of the respective parties to the lots, and by leave of the court filed a cross-bill. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. GlosIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gage v. EichIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Rhodes v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crowe v. KennedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hynes v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lantz v. LantzIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API