Allen v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Dominic Allen appeals his convictions for driving with a suspended license and violating the conditions of his release (based on the same act of unlicensed driving). Allen con*1107tends that his trial judge should have instructed the jury on his proposed defense of necessity. For the reasons explained here, we agree with Allen and we therefore conclude that he is entitled to a new trial.
Underlying facts, and the trial judge’s ruling on Allen’s proposed defense of necessity
On the evening of April 24, 2003, a state trooper pulled Allen over for driving with his headlights…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Cleveland v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- Nelson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Gerlach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McGee v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GarrisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Greenwood v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Clinton R. Strong v. State of Alaska, Tuie Strong v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.