Legal Opinion

State v. Werner

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1992No. 13431PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

The state appeals the grant of a suppression motion. The motion was granted on the basis of the trial court’s finding that the detention to which defendant was subjected was a de facto arrest without probable cause. We disagree and hold that defendant was the subject of an investigatory detention for which there was ample reasonable suspicion.

We note at the outset that probable cause is not an issue in this appeal. The state stipulated below that probable cause was absent, and it does not contend on appeal that there was probable cause for an arrest. As observed in State…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. ManbeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. American Federation of StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. American Federation of StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API