Legal Opinion
State v. American Federation of State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 2012No. 33,792; Docket 30,847PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Appellees American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 18 (AFSCME) and Communication Workers of America (CWA) (collectively, the Unions) represent two groups of classified employees who work for the State of New Mexico. In fiscal year 2009 (FY2009), the State implemented salary increases for its classified employees that differed from those required by collective bargaining agreements previously executed by the State and the Unions. Each Union reacted by filing grievances that were ultimately submitted to arbitration for resolution. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Salazar v. Ramah Navajo ChapterSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. YanceyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- Albuquerque Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Albuquerque Police Officers' Assn. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Doña Anna County v. The Communication Workers of America Local 7911New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. American Federation of StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.