Legal Opinion

State v. Vallejos

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1996No. 16282PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. This case provides us with the opportunity to clarify the law of entrapment in New Mexico, as well as to define the standard of review that we use in evaluating the various entrapment issues raised by a defendant when he is claiming objective entrapment. We hold that: (1) predisposition generally still has a place in the New Mexico law of objective entrapment; (2) the question of what are proper standards of police practice is an issue of law to be decided by the trial court, not the jury, and the determination of the propriety of such standards is freely reviewable…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Duncan v. KerbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Grossman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Robert L. Strauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. VallejosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CurleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API