Jones v. Peek

Two questions are presented in this case:

1. The" affidavit for the writ of attachment stated as the basis therefor that “said Alice M. Jones is about to assign, -dispose of, or conceal her property, with intent to defraud *390her creditors.” It is claimed by the plaintiff, and was held by the court below, that this affidavit was void because it is in the alternative. Counsel for the plaintiff relies upon Kegel v. Schrenkheisen, 37 Mich. 174. In that case the affidavit stated that the defendant “has assigned, disposed of, or concealed, or is about to assign, dispose of, or conceal, his property,”…