Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Boyle
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1928No. Docket Nos. 111, 112PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
These cases involve the same issue, were heard together in the court below and here, and will be disposed of in one opinion. In each case plaintiff instituted attachment proceedings against defendant, the grounds for the issuance of the writ being thus stated:
“Deponent further says that he has good reason to believe and does believe that the said Robert E. Boyle is not a resident of the State of Michigan and has not resided therein for three months immediately preceding the date of this affidavit, or that the said defendant is about to assign, dispose of or conceal some of his property within…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Kegel v. SchrenkheisenMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Detroit Free Press Co. v. Drs. K. & K. U. S. Medical & Surgical Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- First National Bank v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Jones v. PeekMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martin v. SchilloIllinois Supreme Court · 1945