Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 19, 1994No. 04-93-00711-CRPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Justice (Assigned).

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to suppress the results of an intoxilyzer test. Appellee is charged by complaint and information with the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. In two points of error, the State contends that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence of the results of the intoxilyzer test (1) where the State complied with the applicable regulations and (2) the trial court misconstrued the applicable regulations.

Appellee, William V. Reed, was found guilty of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Erdman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Morrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Andrew J. Serrano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Meador v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API