Legal Opinion

Meador v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 29, 1997No. 13-95-231-CR, 13-95-545-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

After a consolidated trial, a jury found appellants, Dan Ervin Meador and Donald Ray Utz, guilty of possession of cocaine in the amount of less than 28 grams. The trial court assessed punishment for each appellant at sixteen years’ confinement. We granted appellants’ requests that both appeals be considered at the same time. Appellants challenge their convictions by five points of error. We affirm.

By their third point of error, appellants contend that the evidence is insufficient to support their convictions for possession of cocaine. Although…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Turro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Escobar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Howard v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Bath v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. Graves v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API