Legal Opinion

Erdman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1993No. 1175-90PublishedCited by 245 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant, Daniel Gig Erdman, was arrested and charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated (D.W.I.). See Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat. art. 6701Z — 1(b). He later filed a motion to suppress the results of an intoxilyzer test administered to him shortly after his arrest. The trial court overruled the motion, however, after an evidentiary hearing. Appellant then pled nolo contendere but reserved the right to appeal the suppression question. See Tex.Code Crim.Proc. art. 44.02.. The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Turpin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. State v. SellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by245 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Griffith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Fienen, Casey RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API