City of San Francisco v. Sharp
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
Action by the city and county of San Francisco to quiet title to the tract of land which was designated on the Van Hess map of 1856 as a “hospital lot,” and which was originally part of the pueblo lands of the city within the corporate limits as defined by the act of April 15, 1851. Such tract was within the scope of ordinance Ho. 833 of the common council of the city approved June 30, 1855—the Van Hess ordinance, and the other ordinances following thereon, relating to the disposition of said pueblo lands, all of which were ratified in terms by the act of the state legislature…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Hoadley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Board of Education v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hoadley's Administrators v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sawyer v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Humboldt County v. Van DuzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Humphreys v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928