Legal Opinion
Sacks v. Office of Foreign Assets Control
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 2006No. 04-36136, 05-35001PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated cross-appeals arise from a challenge to the pre-2003 United States sanctions prohibiting both travel to and the unlicensed donation of humanitarian medical supplies to Iraq. We affirm the district court’s decision that Bertram Sacks has standing to challenge the ban on travel and that the travel ban regulation was validly promulgated. Sacks fails, however, to demonstrate a concrete and imminent likelihood that he will be penalized for violations of the restriction on medical donations. Therefore, his challenge to the restriction on medical donations…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Whitaker v. GarcettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Colwell v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Clancy v. Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Karpova v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.