Legal Opinion

Colwell v. Department of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2009No. 05-55450PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-Appellants bring a pre-en-forcement challenge to Policy Guidance issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) in August 2008 (“2003 Policy Guidance” or “Policy Guidance”). The stated purpose of the Policy Guidance is to clarify the legal obligation of recipients of federal funds to provide meaningful access for individuals with limited English proficiency (“LEP”) to programs supported by those funds. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ suit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), holding under Article III that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Gregory Edison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Oklevueha Native American Church of Hawaii, Inc. v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API