Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights v. City and County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KLEINFELD; Concurrence by Judge SILVERMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRÁBER.
OPINION
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
A majority of the court has concluded that the plaintiffs have standing. A separate majority, for differing reasons, affirms the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claim.
Parts I and II of this opinion are joined by Judges THOMAS, SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, BYBEE, and IKUTA. Part III of this opinion, addressing the merits of the plaintiffs’ claim, is a dissent, joined by Judges BYBEE and IKUTA. Five of us, including Chief Judge KOZINSKI and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Maya v. Centex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Awad v. ZiriaxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- McCollum v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.