Legal Opinion

People v. Hendrix

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1997No. S055275PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A man points a gun at four people seated at a shopping mall table and demands their money. Two comply, and the robber departs. He is subsequently convicted of two counts of robbery and two counts of attempted robbery, and admits three prior serious felonies. Under the three strikes law, must the robber be sentenced consecutively for the four current serious and violent felony convictions? The Court of Appeal held that consecutive sentences were not mandatory, but discretionary, and that the trial court had understood the scope of its discretion in imposing consecutive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. HazeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API