Legal Opinion

People v. Hazelton

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1996No. S051561PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The issue in this case is whether an out-of-state conviction qualifies as a “strike" under the “three strikes” provision of Proposition 184. (Pen Code,1 § 1170.12.) Unlike its legislative predecessor, section 667, subdivisions (b)-(i), this portion of section 1170.12 is ambiguous regarding whether it includes out-of-state convictions. We conclude, in light of the unequivocal evidence of voters’ intent, that the statute is properly construed to include such convictions.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

Defendant William Royal Hazelton was charged with felonies in two separate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. M.S.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API