Legal Opinion
Daniel Green Shoe Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 12, 1967No. (C. D. 2868)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Judge:
This action involves an American manufacturer’s protest filed pursuant to 19 U.S.C.A., section 1516 (section 516, Tariff Act of 1930) contesting the classification of certain footwear as “turn or turned footwear” under item 700.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, with duty assessed thereon at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem. The imported merchandise is described on the invoice as “Mens . . . Aniline Jesters” and “Mens . . . Aniline Mules” and consists of men’s house slippers. It was stipulated that Consumption Entry 831017 pertaining to the imported…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Ashear Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Winter-Wolff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Hy-Glow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.