William B. Tanner v. Caplin & Drysdale Peter Van N. Lockwood Graeme W. Bush and Cono R. Namorato
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. '
In this legal malpractice suit, plaintiff William B. Tanner appeals the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, the law firm of Caplin & Drys-dale and three of its attorneys. 1 On appeal, plaintiff argues that the District Court erred in ruling that plaintiffs expert opinion testimony was insufficient as a matter of law to prove that plaintiff suffered damages as a result of defendants’ alleged malpractice. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
The alleged legal malpractice concerns advice rendered to plaintiff by defendants in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meadows v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Blocker v. DearbornCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Thurmond v. MoxleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. HadenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Ductmate Industries, Inc. v. Famous Supply Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Harriet & Henderson Yarns, Inc. v. CastleDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
- United States v. ReesorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- (HC) Rubio v. NdohDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.