Legal Opinion
Ductmate Industries, Inc. v. Famous Supply Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 6, 1999No. 5:98-cv-02341PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff Ductmate Industries, Inc. sues Defendants Famous Supply Corporation, XL Enterprises, Inc., Duro Dyne Corporation, and Mez Industries, Inc. for direct and indirect infringement of four patents. 1 The patents in suit involve a mechanical system for connecting metal air duct sections together. Plaintiff Ductmate alleges the defendants infringed these patents by manufacturing, distributing and using duet connecting parts and methods that copy Ductmate’s patented devices and methods.
On May 3, 1999, Defendants filed a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- COPAN ITALIA SPA v. PURITAN MEDICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Frazier v. Layne Christensen Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Optigenex, Inc. v. Wolfson Berg LimitedDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020