Legal Opinion

Bank of New York v. Fremont General Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2008No. 05-56653PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION, DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING, AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on February 1, 2008, and published at 514 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir. 2008), is AMENDED as follows:

Page 1019 After <BONY’s damages are therefore the $14 million that the bank was legally obligated to pay to the New York Insurance Department out of its own pocket. > insert a footnote stating: <On remand, Fremont General remains free to argue that these damages should be reduced by an amount proportionate to BONY’s contribution, if any, to causing the harm. See Sorensen v. Allred, 112 Cal.App.3d 717, 726,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Nunez v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Jim Maxwell v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Leigh v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API