Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1934No. Docket No. Crim. 3652PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction carrying the extreme penalty and from orders respectively denying motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment.

We have exhaustively examined the record in this case and unhesitatingly declare that the evidence discloses a ruthless and cold-blooded homicide justifiably characterized by the jury in its verdict as murder in the first degree. On March 8, 1933, the witness Ballinger, a United States customs operator or patrol inspector, had occasion to search an automobile in Seattle Heights, which is approximately fifteen miles north of the city…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. People v. RoccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. CombesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. BriteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. McCrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API