State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*495WYNN, Judge.
By this appeal, defendant Jeffery Scott Smith presents several evidentiary questions for our review: Did the trial court erroneously admit (I) hearsay statements; (II) prior driving while impaired convictions too remote in time to have any probative value; (III) an expert opinion outside of the expert’s field of expertise and (IV) testimony on defendant’s outstanding arrest warrants? We find no error in the admission of this evidence.
The evidence at trial tended to show that defendant and his girlfriend, Melanie Issacs, consumed alcohol throughout the day of 16 January 2001.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re J.J.D.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- In Re JJDLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.