State v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*355Where the trial court failed to adequately instruct the jury on the law as it applied to the material facts of this case, we hold the failure amounts to plain error. Defendant is entitled to a new trial.
On 25 November 2009, defendant was stopped by officers with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department for a traffic violation. When questioned as to whether he had any drugs or weapons in the vehicle, defendant acknowledged carrying marijuana. The officers recovered a baggie containing approximately 28 grams of marijuana from the front passenger compartment and then proceeded…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Galaviz-TorresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. ScaturroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. BeamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. Galaviz-TorresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.