State v. Grant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceSteelman, Judge
I fully concur in the result reached in the majority’s opinion. However, I am compelled to write separately in the matter because I believe the standard of appellate review for decisions of the trial court under Rule 401 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence as stated by the majority and the cases cited by that opinion is incorrect.
The majority states that: “Although a trial court’s rulings on relevancy are not discretionary and we do not review them for an abuse of discretion, we give them great deference on appeal.” The correct standard of appellate review for a trial court’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. DuBoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.