Legal Opinion

Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Muder

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Currier, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding under the statute to condemn for the plaintiff’s use two parcels of ground lying within the corporate limits of the city of Palmyra. One of these parcels, as the petition shows, was required for a roadway in connecting the tracks of the plaintiff’s railroad, and the other for a site for a depot, engine-house and repair-shops. In accordance with the prayer of the petition, commissioners were appointed, who in due time returned into court a report of their proceedings. One of the defendants, Muder, filed exceptions to this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  3. St. Louis & St. Joseph Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad v. Second Municipality of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Caruthersville School District No. 18 v. LatshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. City of AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API