Legal Opinion

St. Louis & St. Joseph Railroad v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 15, 1870PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Fifth District Court. cited 1 Hill, on Rem. for Torts, 297, § 3 ; 43 Penn. 495; 2 Gray, 107 ; 11 Cush. 203 ; 47 Penn. • 428 ; 1 Redf. on Railw. 262-3; 3 Allen, 141. cited Newby v. Platte County, 25 Mo. 258 ; Troy & Boston R.R. v. Lee, 13 Barb. 169; same v. Turnpike Co., 16 Barb. 100; 1 Redf. on Railw. 264, note 21; id. 268, and notes; 6 Ohio St. 182 ; 25 Mo. 544.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

This was a proceeding commenced in the Ray Circuit Court by plaintiff, to condemn, for its own use and for the purpose of constructing its road-bed, a strip of land belonging to the *467defendant. The petition, in accordance with the provisions of the statute, prayed the court to appoint three disinterested householders— citizens of the county — to view the land and assess the damages which the defendant would sustain in consequence of the appropriation and condemnation of the land for the plaintiff’s road-bed. The commissioners were duly appointed, proceeded to the discharge of their duty, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Railroad v. ChrystalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Chicago, Sante Fe & California Railway Co. v. McGrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs R. R. v. Campbell, Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Mississippi River Bridge Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Virginia & Truckee Railroad v. HenryNevada Supreme Court · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API