Legal Opinion

Lelo Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 11, 2015No. 2013-1582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNA, Circuit Judge.

Appellants appeal the finding of the U.S. International Trade Commission that the domestic industry requirements of § 337 were satisfied upon a showing of a “significant investment in plant or equipment” and a “significant employment of labor or capital.” 1 See 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(3). Because the ITC’s domestic industry analysis and determination was based on qualitative factors, we reverse.

Background

Standard Innovation Corporation (“Standard Innovation”), founded in 2004 and headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 7,931,605 (the '605 Patent).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Carcieri v. SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Motorola Mobility, LLC v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hyosung TNS Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corp. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
  3. Lashify, Inc. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API