Legal Opinion
Motorola Mobility, LLC v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 16, 2013No. 19-1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The International Trade Commission determined that Motorola Mobility LLC (Motorola) violated § 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, by importing and selling mobile devices that infringe Microsoft Corporation’s U.S. Patent No. 6,370,566 (’566 patent). Because substantial evidence supports the Commission’s determinations that Motorola did not show that the asserted claims are invalid, and that Microsoft showed that it satisfied the domestic industry requirement, this court affirms.
I
On October 1, 2010, Microsoft filed a complaint in the International…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In Re KubinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Bettcher Industries, Inc. v. Bunzl USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guangdong Alison Hi-Tech Co. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Ajinomoto Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions v. Custopharm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Lelo Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Giuliano v. SanDisk Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.