Legal Opinion

Hyosung TNS Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 17, 2019No. 2017-2563PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dyk, Circuit Judge.

*1355 Hyosung TNS Inc., Nautilus Hyosung America Inc., and HS Global, Inc., (collectively "Hyosung") appeal from a decision by the International Trade Commission ("ITC"). The ITC concluded that various automatic teller machine ("ATM") models imported by Hyosung infringed claims of two patents owned by Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., and Diebold Self-Service Systems (collectively "Diebold"), U.S. Patent Nos. 6,082,616 ('616 patent) and 7,832,631 ('631 patent). The ITC issued a limited exclusion order as well as cease and desist orders.

Because the appeal has become moot as to the '616…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mitchco International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  2. Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  3. Invt Spe LLC v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  4. Zircon Corp. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  5. Lashify, Inc. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API